In the latest Nature, Paul Ginsparg reflects on the history of, and intentions behind arXiv, the internet-based preprint distribution system used mainly by physicists. The arXiv resource is, of course, a topic of much interest to anyone interested in the history of scientific communication and the sociology of scientific integrity. I also think arXiv is a good example of a group that makes intensive use of written scholarship chafing against the restrictions imposed by tradition when unexplored — but compelling — alternatives seem available.
The growth of the community of which Whewell’s Ghost is a part, and the increase in digital archives shows a kindling interest in the internet among historians. Nevertheless, I tend to think that even these historians continue to view it as a sort of news portal, hand-waving venue, and promotional and public relations platform, rather than as a tool of intensive scholarship. It may be necessary to pass through these stages. History is a notoriously individualistic profession, and there is little tradition of communal scholarship from which to build an internet-based scholarship, so it is unsurprising that early efforts have been mainly individualistic. Still, economists’ use of blogs (in addition to newspapers and journals) as intensive testing grounds and battlegrounds for competing ideas, and physicists’ twenty years of arXiv use should show that richer intellectual opportunities beckon.