Somebody somewhere at this moment is writing a reverential essay about Aldo Leopold’s Land Ethic. I feel a little ungenerous, I admit, to write in less than enthusiastic tones. It seems to me though that if the land ethic, Leopold’s extension of the ethical sequence to encompass the land community (including other creatures) and thereby forming the basis for new conservation values, was going to work out we’d have stronger hints of this already. After all, this classic essay in conservation ethics was published in 1949 and has been the subject of lively interest in the intervening year. I am familiar with a lot of the literature surrounding the essay; certainly I know where to find those pieces I have overlooked in the past. Its influence on the history of conservation biology cannot be overstated. To illustrate, in A Companion to Environmental Philosophy (I choose this because it’s here beside me on the desk), the index records entries for “Land Ethic: biotic community” extending over 7 lines, with 18 separate entries (some of which bracket several pages of the text). I am interested, however, in reading of the essay afresh; a reading unencumbered by the scholarly paraphernalia available for this work. I know, that is, that the mild critique I offer here and in future posts have probably been fended off; ably deflected by the academic phalanx the surrounds Leopold’s work, nevertheless, in the spirit of inquiring if the land ethic can be rejuvenated I pose some challenges again. It may be that we must risk deposing this king of ecology. Must, in other words, the land ethic be rescued from Leopold’s treatment of it? It’s time to read Leopold as if he’s being read for the first time.
Read on here.