What’s in a name?

This time last year I wrote a post explaining why 1st May is probably not Paracelsus’ birthday. Today being 1st May I drew attention to this post on Twitter. Arjen Dijksman commented that because Paracelsus’ first name is Philippus, a Christian name, it might be an indication of his true date of birth. He being, presumably, born on that saint’s day, so either 3rd or 26th of May (there are two different St Philips). An interesting theory, but there are major historical problems with Paracelsus’ name, which I briefly sketch [here].

About thonyc

Aging freak who fell in love with the history of science and now resides mostly in the 16th century.
This entry was posted in History. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s