Back in May the Guardian art critic Jonathan Jones asked, “Is Leonardo da Vinci a great artist or a great scientist?” making, as I pointed out at the time, a serious category mistake. Something must be in the drinking water at the Guardian because now Stuart Clark on the Guardians Science Blogs is asking “Was Newton a scientist or a sorcerer?” making, you guessed it, a serious category mistake. As my Internet friend Tom Levenson, who is himself something of a Newton expert, pointed out on twitter Gotta stop with “Scientist and/or sorcerer” nonsense. Newton never saw himself in those terms… In fact Tom’s tweet says it all but for those not in the know, who might want to learn more, I will elaborate.
Join Us Elsewhere!
Twitter Updates
- The 59th Giant's Shoulders #histsci blog carnival - loadsa links! fb.me/26rgBJiGw 1 week ago
- Competition for best post offered to the BSHS #histsci Travel Guide fb.me/29xAgAQJv 1 week ago
- On moustaches and the science of selecting soldiers in WWII fb.me/Km8Tl2xP 1 week ago
- Hooke, Newton and the 'missing' portrait fb.me/1CrTOyRRi 1 week ago
- Gopnik said Galileo was a great scientist because he could admit mistakes. WRONG! fb.me/2BpO1XXeE 1 week ago
Recent Comments
Isaac Newton: The La… on Newton and alchemy: a constant… Rebekah Higgitt on Newton and alchemy: a constant… Fredric Mitchem on Newton and alchemy: a constant… http://google.com on Mount Etna: Significance in th… Luann on Government funding for ‘… Archives
- March 2013 (1)
- February 2013 (3)
- January 2013 (3)
- December 2012 (7)
- November 2012 (9)
- October 2012 (8)
- September 2012 (8)
- August 2012 (14)
- July 2012 (6)
- June 2012 (10)
- May 2012 (11)
- April 2012 (7)
- March 2012 (10)
- February 2012 (12)
- January 2012 (12)
- December 2011 (9)
- November 2011 (12)
- October 2011 (8)
- September 2011 (10)
- August 2011 (13)
- July 2011 (27)
- June 2011 (17)
- May 2011 (13)
- April 2011 (12)
- March 2011 (11)
- February 2011 (20)
- January 2011 (18)
- December 2010 (21)
- November 2010 (16)
- October 2010 (23)
- September 2010 (37)
- Administrative Astrology astronomy Biology Book Book Reviews Chemistry Conferences Early Scientific Printing Environmental History Epistemology Evolution General Science Geology Giants' Shoulders Historiography History Humour? Institutions Links mathematics Museums Philosophy Physics Religion Reviews Science Space Exploration Teaching HPS
History of Biology
History of Physics
History of Science: General
Philosophy of Biology
- Biology and Philosophy journal
- Center for Philosophy of Biology at Duke
- Consortium for the History and Philosophy of Biology
- History and Philosophy of Biology at Exeter
- History and Philosophy of Biology Resources
- Philosophy of Biology Web Pages
- PhilPapers
- Stanford Encyclopedia: Philosophy of Biology
- The International Society for History, Philosophy, and Social Studies of Biology (ISHPSSB)
- The philosophy of biology: a selection of readings and resources
Philosophy of Physics
Philosophy of Science: General
Philosophy of Technology
Science Wars
Pingback: “Was Newton a scientist or a sorcerer? | Early modern philosophy (mostly natural) | Scoop.it